New York City Fire Department Retirees

Current News Items

RETIREES NEWS
CURRENT NEWS ITEMS
COMING EVENTS
VIDEOS
BENEFITS
WHAT TO DO?
NEWS FOR SENIORS
MISC INFORMATION
FIREFIGHTER MEMORIALS
ELECTED OFFICIALS
EXECUTIVE BOARD
PHOTO ALBUMS
GET INVOLVED
ADVERTISERS
LINKS
STATEN ISLAND DIRECTORY
History of FDNY SI RETIREES
GUEST BOOK
CONTACT US HERE
Private
Some current articles that are of interest to our brothers
 

Taxation of Disability Pensions

As you may recall, the IRS challenged the City’s tax treatment of those portions of disability pensions that are unrelated to the “disability benefit”; specifically payments based on seniority (1/60ths) and the ITHP.  These issues arose first in other NYC retirement systems, but ultimately involved the Fire Department and all other uniformed force plans. 
The UFOA was part of a coalition of most of the uniformed unions that hired special tax counsel to review the positions of the IRS and NYC Department of Law.  We were advised that we did not have a viable basis to contest the tax treatment of the retirement earnings in question, and we and the other unions cooperated with the City’s effort to negotiate a resolution of the matter that would avoid a substantial retroactive application.  In this sole respect, the unions and City succeeded.
The IRS and City are accordingly implementing their agreement: effective January 1, 2009, all new retirees who retire for an accidental disability and have more than 20 years, will be subject to Federal taxation on their 1/60ths and their ITHP. These members will receive a 1099 form from the City each tax year, enumerating those earnings that will be considered taxable.
            There is no retroactive application of this agreement; if you retired before 1/1/09, you are not affected.  If you retire for an accidental disability and your date of application is before January 1, 2009, you will not be subject to Federal taxation on these parts of your retirement income. Simply put, while the parameters for taxation have changed, the regulations regarding the steps toward retirement and the application for a disability retirement have not.

LODI FICA Refund Update

Per NYC Office of Payroll Administration, the IRS has still not provided a
date it expects to pay to the City the 1989-2005 LODI FICA refunds. The UFA
will announce expected refund dates as soon as this information becomes
available.

The above appeared in the UFA 65-2 #51 dated 7-10-08 
www.ufanyc.org

  Retiree. health plans cut OK'd

EEOC Companies can end coverage for former workers when they turn 65 and can qualify for Medicare


Companies can scale back their retiree health care coverage once their former employees.qualify for Medicare, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has Affirmed.

The ruling, which took effect Wednesday, sanctions the prevailing practice of employers offering health insurance for retirees younger than 65 and then trimming ox eliminating benefits once they, receive Medicare.The commission decided the practice does not violate age. discrimination laws.In contrast to their pensions, workers are not vested in retiree health benefits, so companies can terminate them.

Employers have dramatically curtailed their retiree health coverage. Only 35 percent of employers with more than 200 workers offered such coverage in 2006; .down from 66 percent in 1988, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.Coverage is even less prevalent for older retirees. Only 21 percent of large employers offer such benefits to Medicare eligible retirees, while 31 percent do to younger ones, according to a recent study by Mercer, a Manhattan based consulting company.The EEOC began investigating the issue after a 2000 court decision ruled that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act required employers providing retiree health benefits to do the same, or spend the same amount on, benefits for Medicare eligible retirees as for younger retirees.An unusual coalition of employers and labor unions banded together to fight the ruling, saying it would lead companies to reduce benefits for younger retirees.The commission agreed and said its latest ruling wouldsafeguard retiree health benefits."By this action, the EEOC seeks to preserve and protect employer provided retiree health benefits which are increasingly less available and less generous," Naomi C. Earp, the commission's chairwoman, said in a statement.Reaction to the EEOC ruling was mixed: Employer groups hailed it while the HARP condemned it.

The EEOC's action will not prompt companies to cut back on benefits for older retirees, but will instead allow them to keep retiree coverage in place for younger ones, said James Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, which represents large companies.It allows companies to provide coverage to an otherwise vulnerable population. those who are no longer actively employed but are also not eligible for Medicare," he, said.

But the AARP, which asked for a temporary restraining order in an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to block the rule from taking effect, said the action would shift health care costs to older workers."It is a wrongheaded move to legalize discrimination, allowing employers to back off their health care commitments based on nothing more than age," said David Certner; AARP's legislative policy director.

If you have any information that should be on this page please email us and tell us what you have.